Home | ICHCH 2025

About the Conference

With the escalating global digital wave, digitization has become the engine driving economic development, presenting new challenges and opportunities for enterprise management and business economics. Against this backdrop, we cordially invite you to participate in the 2025 International Conference on Hybrid Commerce, Human Capital, and Economic Dynamics. This symposium will be held this year in Hangzhou, aiming to delve into the strategic management of the digital age and explore the direction and strategies for future business development.

As an international academic symposium in the field of digital strategy and contemporary management, we will delve into the impact of the digital age on enterprise management, focusing on the ever-changing trends in the digital economy. We will explore how enterprises can better cope with and practice strategic planning, innovation management, leadership development, information systems, and technological innovation in an environment of evolving information technology.

This symposium will invite internationally renowned scholars, industry professionals, and policymakers to share their latest research findings and practical experiences in the field of digital strategy and contemporary management. We believe that through this exchange and sharing, it will provide a platform for in-depth discussions on the challenges and opportunities of management in the digital age for the global academic community and business sector, promote knowledge sharing, stimulate ideological collisions, and drive the development of management innovation in the digital age. We look forward to your presence and participation, witnessing the new chapter of business management in the digital age.

Call for Paper

We welcome participants to submit and share research findings and theoretical discussions towards these topics:

Track 1：Digital Economy and Hybrid Commerce Innovation
Track 2：Human Capital in the Digital Era
Track 3：Economic Dynamics and Policy Implications

We also welcome research findings and theoretical discussions in other related fields as long as they fit the conference themes and focuses.

Details

Submission

All papers will be reviewed by the Committee on the basis of quality, relevance, originality, significance, and clarity. Please submit your full paper by email with both .doc/.docx and .pdf formats attached directly to ichch25@yeah.net. Papers that do not comply with the submission guidelines will be rejected without review.

Publication

Accepted papers will be included and published in Conference Proceedings, which will be submitted to databases below:

CPCI (subject to acceptance)
CNKI
Google Scholar
Crossref

Download

Conference Proceedings uses author-prepared PDFs for publication.

It is important to ensure that your paper complies with the template format.

Download Template

Clients

Important Dates

Abstract Submission

September 17, 2025

Full Paper Submission

October 10th, 2025

Notification of Acceptance Date

October 25, 2025

Final Paper Submission

November 10, 2025

The proceeding adheres to a rigorous, double-blind peer review process to ensure academic quality and ethical standards. Key steps are outlined below:

Manuscript Allocation: Within one week after submission, the Editor-in-Chief assigns each manuscript to 2–3 independent reviewers with expertise aligned to the paper’s topic. Reviewers must declare no conflicts of interest (e.g., collaborations, institutional affiliations, or financial ties with authors) prior to participation.
Initial Screening (1 week): Reviewers conduct a preliminary check for compliance with formatting guidelines, structural completeness (abstract, methods, results, etc.), and thematic relevance. Manuscripts failing to meet basic standards are desk-rejected, with detailed feedback provided to authors.
In-Depth Evaluation (3 weeks): Reviewers assess the manuscript’s originality, methodological validity, data integrity, and contribution to the field. Evaluations include:
- A categorical rating (Accept/Minor Revision/Major Revision/Reject)
- Constructive comments for improvement
- A confidential recommendation to the Editor
Decision-Making & Conflict Resolution: The Editor consolidates reviews and resolves discrepancies through panel discussions. Final decisions prioritize both scholarly rigor and a target acceptance rate of [40%], which balances selectivity with support for emerging research. Borderline manuscripts may undergo additional review or statistical validation.
Author Notification: Authors receive a decision within 1-week post-review, including anonymized reviewer comments. Accepted manuscripts proceed to production; others may be invited to resubmit after revision (2-month revision window).
Revisions & Appeals: Revised manuscripts are re-evaluated within 2 weeks. Authors may appeal decisions with a point-by-point rebuttal, which triggers an independent audit by the Editorial Board.

Reviewers are typically asked to evaluate papers based on several criteria:

Originality and Innovation: Is the paper presenting new ideas, methodologies, or findings? Does it contribute to the advancement of the field?
Technical Soundness: Are the methods used sound and appropriate? Is the analysis rigorous? Are the results well-supported by the data?
Relevance to the Conference: Does the paper fit within the scope of the conference themes and tracks?
Clarity and Organization: Is the paper well-organized, with clear arguments and structure? Are the ideas presented in a coherent and understandable way?
Literature Review and References: Does the paper appropriately engage with existing literature? Is there a clear understanding of the state of the field?
Ethical Considerations: Does the research adhere to ethical standards, especially in areas like data privacy, human subjects, etc.?
Practical Implications: For applied research, reviewers will also assess the potential practical impact or applications of the findings.
Each of these criteria is typically scored on a numerical scale (e.g., 1-5), and reviewers are asked to provide detailed feedback and suggestions for improvement.

By submitting a paper to ICFMDE 2025, the authors agree to the review process and understand that papers undergo a peer-review process. Manuscripts will be reviewed by appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the conference committee, who will give detailed comments, and if the submission gets acceptance, the authors submit a revised version that takes into account this feedback. All papers are reviewed using a double-blind review process. The Committees of ICFMDE 2025 invest great efforts in reviewing the papers submitted to the conference and organizing the sessions to enable the participants to gain maximum benefit.

COPE Compliance: All participants follow the COPE Ethical Guidelines.
Gender/Geographic Inclusion: Reviewers evaluate whether gender, race, or geographic factors are appropriately addressed.
Diversity Auditors: 2 committee members monitor demographic balance in accepted papers quarterly.
AI Usage: AI tools (e.g., plagiarism detection, statistical error flags) assist but never replace human judgment.